The Danger of The New Refugee Regulations: Pre-Removal Risk Assessments
This summer, along with other significant changes to Canada’s refugee system, the government of Canada placed restrictions on pre-removal risk assessments.
A pre-removal risk assessments explores whether there is significant danger (the threat of death, torture, other cruel and unusual punishment etc.) to failed refugee claimants if they were to be deported. While the refugees who are facing deportation may be entitled to a hearing, often there is a significant amount of time that passes between the hearing and deportation where new evidence can arise that validates a refugee’s claims that they could be facing death if they were to be deported. But with the limits on pre-removal risk assessments, this evidence may never be heard.
The CBC tells of one such story, which is particularly horrifying. Asif Khan Khalil is a superstar squash player that claimed refugee status in Canada in August of 2010. Native to Pakistan, Asif says that he would face death in his home city, which is largely controlled by the Taliban.
Asif’s success and achievements with a Western sport is considered to be a serious crime against Islam and the Taliban, a spokesman of which said (in a sworn affidavit) that Asif was “spreading poison of Western civilization by playing the Western sport of squash… [he is] a cancer upon society and a very poisonous influence on the young people in the area.”
Evidence such as that sworn affidavit and another that says his father has had visits from Taliban members threatening to kill Asif, one of which resulted in his father and his wife being beaten, is new evidence that the federal government has not heard and may never hear.
Asif is currently facing deportation from Canada because his refugee claim was denied, the government citing that there was not enough evidence that he was in danger.
These new regulations put some of the most vulnerable people in the world – who Canada has an obligation to help – in even more danger. Those who have been denied the opportunity to obtain a pre-removal risk assessment may need that opportunity the most.
Read more about Asif here.
The content and comments of this blog are not legal advise and and may not be accurate or complete. If you require legal advice, contact a licensed legal practitioner directly. If you post on this blog, you assume full responsibility for disclosing your identity to the public and VisaPlace nor its affiliates are not responsible for protecting your privacy nor your identity concerning your participation in our blog and you assume any risks in participating.
I hired them for my study permit application! I had been denied twice and thanks to them the 3rd try was a success. Lisa Inspektor was my main contact. She is Very nice and polite. I strongly recommend you to go with them! The money you’re gonna spend is gonna be worth it
I had an excellent experience working with Visa Place, communicating with them was very easy. I initially tried to navigate my immigration issue personally, but it was much more efficient allowing everything to be handled by the experts. Thank you so much Sarah, Lauren, Natasha, and Sukhi for all of your help!
Thanks to Alicea and Rania for their excellent service. This is the 2 nd time we are using them and they have always delivered successful results, even where other law firms has been unsuccessful. Alicea has been especially helpful and available to address all our concerns. She has an excellent work ethic. We will be using them again and always recommend them to our friends.